Well, I asked, and boy did you deliver. Here are the first few submissions to Don't Show-cha Your Chocha:
An anonymous reader quickly pointed out this glaring sartorial error as featured on Go Fug Yourself:
This picture basically speaks for itself (ummm...is her entire ass hanging out the back?), but there's more witty commentary here.Reader Christine knew she had to check BabyPhat first (ah yes, we can always count on Kimora can't we?), and her instincts served her well:
"I love how they specify that the 'dress' is 31 inches in length. And it's $54. So that's how many dollars per inch? Too bad I'm bad at math."I second that--those are some damn expensive and ineffective inches.
Bernie found this great photo on the Urban Outfitters website:
I think she said it best in her email: "That poor girl."This feature is ongoing (at least until people get the whole shirt vs. dress thing sorted out...it might be awhile), so keep 'em coming! Send your semi-pornographic finds to daddylikeyblog@gmail.com
12 comments:
eww that's kristen cavalari in the first photo. no likey.
has no one heard of leggings?!
I love how the Baby Phat dress is also see-through. In case the length is just not gynocological enough!
all these dresses are influenced by the 60s/70s (in the case of baby phat one, maybe just the length...ahem!)...difference is, back then they wore little short shorts or something else underneath.
i lament the fact we live in a britney spears pantyless world now. modesty is dead. class is dead.
Hooray! I made it to the blog!
But I'm a girl. :o)
"Dresses" that come just short of bearing one's nether regions = a very bad idea. Very bad. *shudders*
Stefanie--
Huge fan of leggings too. I'm actually wearing some right now under a mini-skirt that would be completely inappropriate without them.
Tricia--
I might have to do a post on cute little short shorts to wear under these, because yeah, this is getting ridiculous.
Bernie--
Hahaha I'm sorry about the little mix-up (your name is quite confusing), but I have added a consonant to your pronoun and things should be all better now.
Unfortunately, this trend has taken to the halls (of my high school). Booo ppl wearing oversized t-shirts as dresses with thongs underneath.
PS - Winona, you always talk about discovering blogs. Discover mine!! haha
so hilarious! i love this feature. these dresses are ALL over new york. i have one but i wear it with courderoys like a grandma.
thanks for this - anyway we can email this to post, um, everyone
I have the urban outfitters dress, and seriously in person it's too cute. But I HAVE to wear it with leggings because I realized that if I raise my arms just a little, you can totally see my underwear. I consider it a "top" not a dress.
I also have the urban outfitters dress, and with some dark wash skinnies it transitions beautifully into a shirt.
do you see something on this page that looks a little too much like soft porn?
http://store.americanapparel.net/women-bras.html
yikes!
Post a Comment